| Distinguished University Professor Award A faculty member is an essential focus in any educational institution that seeks advancement and progress. The educational system cannot be completed with its three dimensions: effective education and learning, sober scientific research, and community service. Except in the presence of a distinguished and ambitious university professor. In view of the College of Education's keenness to provide a stimulating academic climate for its faculty members, the College took the initiative to offer the Distinguished University Professor Award to open new horizons for creativity and honest competition, encourage positive competition among faculty members, enhance professional and academic growth, develop self-abilities to improve teaching skills, and use Modern teaching methods involving creativity and distinction. In order to make a real contribution to improving teaching and learning processes. Award goals: ● Encouraging positive competition among faculty members; To achieve creativity in teaching performance. ● Developing an entrepreneurial spirit that contributes to the development of the educational process, and upgrading the level of educational service in the college. - appreciated the efforts of faculty excellence in teaching, and to highlight their achievements and their efforts and excellence . ● Encouraging faculty members to extrapolate the university's mission in the field of teaching and learning. - motivating faculty member to provide the best practices and applications . - creating an academic environment creative competitive . - multi - talent discovery at the university faculty members . - the enrichment of sound scientific research by faculty members . - active participation in community service . - highlighting the competencies of the faculty members of the distinguished . - Exchanging distinguished performance experiences and sharing success stories in the fields of teaching . Target group: Faculty members (professor, associate professor, assistant professor), in addition to lecturers and instructors who teach courses fully. Conditions for applying for the award: The applicant for this award must observe the following conditions: ● She must have an excellent grade for the annual report for the academic year that precedes the year she applies for candidacy. ● The candidate must have completed at least one academic year of teaching at the university. ● That a faculty member be on the job, and not be on exceptional leave, or a scientific sabbatical during the candidacy period. ● The nominated faculty member should not have any violations or disciplinary councils, or have been subjected to discipline and punishment in the past two years. ● The prize winner is not entitled to run again; only after three years. Award application procedures: The procedures for applying for the award are: ● A faculty member applies for the award by filling out the form on the college website and attaching the relevant documents. With following the instructions attached in the application, and submitting them to the award committee according to the times specified for nomination. ● The award committee submits a report on the nominees to the Dean of the College, in which the committee's selection of the winner is determined at the college level. This is after screening the applicant candidates and evaluating them according to the standards and provisions of the stipulated bylaw. ● The applicant must organize the nomination file according to what is indicated in the nomination form. Mechanisms and criteria for evaluating applicants for the award: The award committee forms a special jury of those with relevant experiences, as it reviews and sorts all the applications submitted to it, and the committee considers filling in the award form a confirmation by the faculty member giving the committee complete freedom to inquire about it, and contacting the current and former head of the department, as one of the evaluation methods That will be followed by the committee, and the committee can also resort to some means such as: ● Department Head evaluation ● Female Colleagues Evaluation ● Course files ● personal interview ● Analyzing some minutes of the department's meetings, and studying achievement reports. ● He saw the students and the interactions with the candidate faculty member. The criteria for evaluating female applicants include the following: ● The annual evaluation of the faculty member ● Teaching load ● Professional development ● Teaching performance ● Community Service ● Membership of scientific committees and councils ● Presenting seminars and scientific events ● Submit a proposal to develop its educational department Distribution of grades The scores are distributed on the various criteria as follows: | M | Standard | Rating score | percentage | | 1 | Teaching load | 10 | 10% | | 2 | Professional development | 15th | 15th% | | 3 | Teaching performance (course file - website - use of technology in teaching - evaluation of students) | 40 | 40% | | 4 | Community Service | 5 | 5% | | 5 | Membership of scientific committees and councils | 10 | 10% | | 6 | A proposal to develop the department's academic programs | 5 | 5% | | 7 | Electronic courses | 5 | 5% | | 8 | Evaluation of the department head and students | 5 | 5% | | 9 | Academic Advising | 5 | 5% | | Total | | 100 | 100% |
Distinguished employee award The ideal administrative employee award is considered as a periodic annual award, and this award aims to spread the culture of quality and managerial excellence among the college's employees. To motivate them to achieve achievement and creativity at work in order to achieve the goals of the college in accordance with the standards of quality and excellence . Award goals The award seeks to develop the administrative process and improve the college's performance through: ● Motivating female employees in the college to achieve quality and excellence in administrative performance. ● Encouraging positive competition among female employees in the college for creativity in administrative work. ● Developing an entrepreneurial spirit that contributes to the development and development of administrative processes in the college. ● Enhancing creativity and excellence in administrative work to achieve the college's mission . ● Supporting the trend towards sharing administrative experiences among female employees, to raise the quality of performance and enhance the spirit of cooperation to advance the administrative work of the college as a whole. Terms of the award Each candidate for the award must observe the following conditions: ● To have an excellent grade in the job performance evaluation for the past year. ● The employee's period of work in the administrative unit above which is advanced should not be less than one year of work. ● A previously awarded prize winner is not entitled to apply for the award; Only after three years of winning. ● That the employee is at her job and is not on exceptional leave, childcare or deputation during the nomination period. ● The employee must be of good conduct. ● The employee has not been subjected to job discipline and punishment in the past two years. Award application procedures The award is submitted by filling out the form on the college's website, attaching the relevant documents and following the instructions attached to the application. Nomination mechanisms and criteria for evaluating applicants for the award The award committee undertakes the faculty; Which includes those with experience in receiving and evaluating nominations, and the committee also uses some evaluation tools, such as: current and former officials, personal interviews, female colleagues 'opinion, examination of some documents, examination and analysis of some meeting minutes, study of achievement reports, and the opinion of internal clients (female students, those dealing with The nominated employee from different departments within the college), as well as external clients. The award nomination process is as follows: 1- Personal nomination by the employee: The employee nominates herself for the Distinguished Employee Award through the following steps: ● Fill out the nomination application form in the aspects related to the candidate. ● Attach a CV explaining the various achievements. ● Attach a recommendation from the line manager in the department in which you work. ● Attach the evidence, testimonials, and evidence of the achievements mentioned in the CV. ● Attach copies of course attendance certificates. ● The development proposal for the employee's department. ● Sample presentations from the employee's work using the latest presentation and design programs. ● A report on the events and activities that the employee participated in, specifying her role in them. ● A fingerprint scanner for attendance, departure and absence. 2- Nomination of the department or department in which the employee works: where the department or department in which the female employee works nominates her for the award; By submitting a letter addressed by the head of the department or department to the employee explaining her nomination for the award, and asking the employee to complete the requirements and steps contained in the personal nomination . The nomination mechanisms for the Distinguished Employee Award include the following steps : ● Nominations are collected at the department or unit level, whether personal nominations, management nominations, or the unit in which the employee works. ● All certificates, evidence and evidence shall be attached to the nomination form. The direct manager of the nominated employee takes the following steps: ● Reviewing, checking and signing the application form for female candidates . ● Putting appropriate grades on the items of evaluation criteria for the candidate. The initial nomination for the owner of the authority, along with all the attachments, shall be submitted to it: ● Ensure that the nomination forms are complete and regular. ● Review the forms and grades given to each candidate. ● It is approved and notarized by the authorized person in this department or unit. The authorized person submits the nominations to the award committee with all the attachments, and the committee works on the following: ● Receiving the files of the female candidates for the Distinguished Employee Award, and ensuring the regularity of the nominations. ● Ensure that the nominees' files meet the requirements of the award in accordance with the standards and provisions of the stipulated bylaw. ● Reviewing and reviewing the evidence and verifying its conformity with the standards and the appropriateness of the grades assigned to the clauses of the standards. ● Ensure the fairness of the nominations in the comparison between the applicants. ● Differentiation of the candidates based on scores, evidence and evidence. ● Polling shall be conducted when the scores are equal. ● Documenting the nomination results in the minutes and identifying the names of the winners. Criteria for evaluating the applicants for the award: The criteria for evaluating applicants include the following: ● The annual evaluation of the employee. ● Advanced qualifications and skills. ● Functionality and advanced productivity. ● Service to beneficiaries. ● Initiative and Effective Communication. ● A proposal to develop the administrative unit in which you work. Distribution of grades: The scores are distributed on the various criteria as follows: | M | Standard | percentage | | 1 | Annual evaluation of the employee for the previous year | 5% | | 2 | Advanced qualifications and skills | 20% | | 3 | Outstanding performance and performance\ | 25% | | 4 | Cooperation and functional behavior | 25% | | 5 | Initiative, creativity and responsibility | 20% | | 6 | A proposal to develop the administrative unit | 5% | | Total | | 100% |
Distinguished Department Award Distinguished Academic Department Award; It is an annual award that aims to spread the culture of quality and administrative, scientific and academic excellence among the departments in the College of Education, because the departments are the beating heart of the college and the engine for all operations and activities in it, and therefore the importance of motivating these departments with all their cadres to achieve achievement and creativity in the work in order to achieve the goals of the college. According to the standards of quality and excellence . Award goals The award seeks to develop the educational process and improve the college's performance through: ● Motivating departments in the college to achieve quality and excellence in administrative performance. ● Encouraging positive competition between departments in the college for creativity in administrative work. ● Developing an entrepreneurial spirit that contributes to the development and development of academic work. ● Promoting creativity and excellence in academic and research work to achieve the college's mission. Terms of the award The section applying for the award must observe the following conditions: ● That at least 60% of the department members have a scientific publication (authoring books, translating books, scientific papers, scientific articles, working papers at conferences); Attached is proof of scientific production. ● That there should be a contribution from the faculty members in the department to attend or participate in internal or external scientific conferences during the year with proof of this being submitted. ● That the department holds at least a "scientific seminar," or a "workshop," or a "scientific forum" in every semester, and the department submits proof of that. ● That the department present a development plan for the department and its academic programs. ● There should be a contribution from the members of the department in community service. ● The department must have partnerships with the public or private sector. ● The department must have a plan to obtain programmatic accreditation. ● That the department is characterized by the speed of response to the correspondence received from the college agencies and administrative departments. ● Fill out the Award nomination form. Evaluation mechanisms and criteria: The comparison between the advanced scientific departments is done according to the following criteria: - Teaching students and faculty members - Graduate Programs - Scientific Publications - organizing Alsamnarat, forums and workshops - Partnerships - programmatic accreditation Distribution of grades: The scores are distributed on the various criteria as follows: | M | Standard | percentage | | 1 | Percentage of scientific publication of the department members | 20% | | 2 | Contribution of department members to attend or participate in internal or external scientific conferences | 5% | | 3 | Holding "scientific seminars", "workshops", or "scientific forums"" | 15th% | | 4 | Postgraduate programs and development plans | 20% | | 5 | Community service | 15th% | | 6 | Partnerships | 15th% | | 7 | Work on programmatic accreditation | 10% | | Total | | 100% |
Dean's honorary list Dean's honorary list; It is a quarterly award that includes the names of students from the bachelor's, master's and diploma stages who achieved distinguished academic performance during the semester, and was approved by the Deanship of the College of Education as part of its continuous efforts to support and develop the college environment and make it attractive and ready for creativity, scientific research and academic excellence. This list aims to distinguish students who have excelled academically during their studies, and to motivate them to give in a positive competitive atmosphere.. Award goals: - Encourage students to academic excellence in an atmosphere of positive competition . - Care and honor for outstanding students at the college level; to create a generation of distinguished young women in various academic and educational fields . - promoting scientific excellence effort, pushing students for leadership at the local and global level . - creating an academic environment creative competitive . - multi - talent discovery of the students in the College of Education. Conditions for applying for the award: - to be a regular student in the study . ● The student must have successfully completed a total of (20) credit hours. ● That the student has not exceeded the statutory period for graduation. ● That the student has not committed a violation that requires issuing a warning or penalty at the college or university level. ● That the cumulative GPA of the student is not less than 3.75 out of 5. ● That the student has not failed or been deprived in any of the curricula of the study plan during the study period. ● That the student actively participates in the student and social activities of the college and the university. ● That the student's skill record attests to the diversity of her skills, activities and interests. Award application procedures: The award committee forms a special jury of those with relevant experiences, as it reviews and sorts all the applications submitted to it, and the committee considers filling in the award form a confirmation by the student giving the committee complete freedom to inquire about it, and contacting the head of the department and members of the faculty who have previously taught the nominated student ; This is as one of the evaluation methods that the committee will follow, and therefore the committee can resort to some methods such as: ● academic registration ● Department Head evaluation ● Evaluation of faculty members ● Skill Record ● personal interview ● The student fills out the form on the college website and sends it to the award committee's email. Mechanisms and criteria for evaluating applicants for the award: ● At the beginning of each semester, the Awards Committee meets to select the students who are qualified to enter the Dean's honorary list. ● The main criterion for differentiation between students is the GPA. Additional differentiation criteria are used when the cumulative rates are equal. Distribution of grades: The scores are distributed on the various criteria as follows: | M | Standard | percentage | | 1 | The semester average for the student | 50% | | 2 | Effective and distinguished participation within the college and university (two marks for each activity, with a maximum of 14 points) | 20% | | 3 | Effective and distinguished participation in educational activities (two degrees for each activity, with a maximum of 10 points) | 10% | | 4 | Professional development and development | 10% | | 5 | Evaluation of faculty members | 5% | | 6 | Commitment to positive behavior and a decent appearance | 5% | | Total | | 100% |
| 
